G650ER
$66.5M
Falcon 8X
$59.0M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | G650ER | Falcon 8X |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 7,500 nmWinner | 6,450 nm |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.925Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.9 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 6,299 ft | 5,910 ftShort Field |
| Max Operating Altitude | 51,000 ft | 51,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 19 pax | 16 pax |
| Cabin Width | 8.2 ftWider | 7.7 ft |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 3,290 ftLower Altitude | 3,900 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The G650ER excels in sheer capability with a 7500nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Falcon 8X counters with 6450nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the G650ER focuses on its 4-zone configuration (8.2ft wide), the Falcon 8X provides 7.7ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Gulfstream G650ER is a compelling choice in the ultra long range segment because it combines cre... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the ultra long range class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Falcon 8X shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.