Falcon 8X
$59.0M
G650ER
$66.5M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 8X | G650ER |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 6,450 nm | 7,500 nmWinner |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.9 | Mach 0.925Winner (Speed) |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 5,910 ftShort Field | 6,299 ft |
| Max Operating Altitude | 51,000 ft | 51,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 16 pax | 19 pax |
| Cabin Width | 7.7 ft | 8.2 ftWider |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 3,900 ft | 3,290 ftLower Altitude |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 8X excels in sheer capability with a 6450nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the G650ER counters with 7500nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 8X focuses on its 3-zone configuration (7.7ft wide), the G650ER provides 8.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 8X is a compelling choice in the ultra long range segment because it combines cr... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the ultra long range class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Falcon 8X shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.