Falcon 6X
$52.0M
Challenger 3500
$27.0M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 6X | Challenger 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 5,500 nmWinner | 3,400 nm |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.9Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.83 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 5,480 ft | 4,835 ftShort Field |
| Max Operating Altitude | 51,000 ft | 45,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 16 pax | 10 pax |
| Cabin Width | 8.5 ftWider | 7.2 ft |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 3,900 ftLower Altitude | 4,850 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 6X excels in sheer capability with a 5500nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Challenger 3500 counters with 3400nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 6X focuses on its 3-zone configuration (8.5ft wide), the Challenger 3500 provides 7.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 6X is a compelling choice in the long range segment because it combines credible... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the long range class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Challenger 3500 shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.