Falcon 50EX
$21.0M
Challenger 350
$26.7M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 50EX | Challenger 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 3,260 nmWinner | 3,200 nm |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.84Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.83 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 4,935 ft | 4,835 ftShort Field |
| Max Operating Altitude | 49,000 ft | 45,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 9 pax | 10 pax |
| Cabin Width | 6.1 ft | 7.2 ftWider |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 8,000 ft | 4,850 ftLower Altitude |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 50EX excels in sheer capability with a 3260nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Challenger 350 counters with 3200nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 50EX focuses on its 1-zone configuration (6.1ft wide), the Challenger 350 provides 7.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 50EX remains a meaningful Falcon model for operators, buyers, and aviation resea... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the super mid size class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Falcon 50EX shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.