Falcon 2000
$25.0M
Challenger 601
$13.0M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 2000 | Challenger 601 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 3,050 nm | 3,370 nmWinner |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.84Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.82 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 5,220 ftShort Field | 5,830 ft |
| Max Operating Altitude | 47,000 ft | 41,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 10 pax | 12 pax |
| Cabin Width | 7.7 ft | 8.2 ftWider |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 8,000 ft | 8,000 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 2000 excels in sheer capability with a 3050nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Challenger 601 counters with 3370nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 2000 focuses on its 2-zone configuration (7.7ft wide), the Challenger 601 provides 8.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 2000 remains a meaningful Falcon model for operators, buyers, and aviation resea... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the large cabin class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Challenger 601 shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.