Falcon 200
$5.5M
Learjet 55C
$8.5M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 200 | Learjet 55C |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 2,050 nmWinner | 2,040 nm |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.84Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.81 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 5,440 ft | 5,000 ftShort Field |
| Max Operating Altitude | 42,000 ft | 51,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 9 pax | 10 pax |
| Cabin Width | 6.1 ftWider | 5.9 ft |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 8,000 ft | 8,000 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 200 excels in sheer capability with a 2050nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Learjet 55C counters with 2040nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 200 focuses on its 1-zone configuration (6.1ft wide), the Learjet 55C provides 5.9ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 200 remains a meaningful Falcon model for operators, buyers, and aviation resear... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the mid size class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Learjet 55C shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.