Falcon 20
$1.8M
Learjet 55
$7.0M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Falcon 20 | Learjet 55 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 1,800 nm | 2,040 nmWinner |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.84Winner (Speed) | Mach 0.81 |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 5,200 ftShort Field | 5,300 ft |
| Max Operating Altitude | 42,000 ft | 51,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 9 pax | 10 pax |
| Cabin Width | 5.7 ft | 5.9 ftWider |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 8,000 ft | 8,000 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Falcon 20 excels in sheer capability with a 1800nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Learjet 55 counters with 2040nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Falcon 20 focuses on its 1-zone configuration (5.7ft wide), the Learjet 55 provides 5.9ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Dassault Falcon 20 remains a meaningful Falcon model for operators, buyers, and aviation researc... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the mid size class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Learjet 55 shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.