Challenger 3500
$27.0M
G280
$25.0M
Technical Specification Matrix
Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Challenger 3500 | G280 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Range (NBAA IFR) | 3,400 nm | 3,600 nmWinner |
| Max Cruise Speed | Mach 0.83 | Mach 0.85Winner (Speed) |
| Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW) | 4,835 ft | 4,750 ftShort Field |
| Max Operating Altitude | 45,000 ft | 45,000 ft |
Cabin Environment
| Max Certified Seating | 10 pax | 10 pax |
| Cabin Width | 7.2 ft | 7.2 ft |
| Cabin Altitude @ FL410 | 4,850 ftLower Altitude | 7,000 ft |
Expert Insights
Range & Capability
The Challenger 3500 excels in sheer capability with a 3400nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the G280 counters with 3600nm.
Cabin Architecture
While the Challenger 3500 focuses on its 2-zone configuration (7.2ft wide), the G280 provides 7.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.
Technological Edge
The Bombardier Challenger 3500 is a compelling choice in the super mid-size segment because it combi... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the super mid size class.
Operating Economics (Est.)
Variable Costs Per Hour
Economic Note
Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Challenger 3500 shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.