PLANEPEDIA
Homechevron_rightComparisonschevron_rightCitation Longitude vs Challenger 3500
Textron Aviation

Citation Longitude

Citation Longitude
Starting List Price

$30.0M

Bombardier

Challenger 3500

Challenger 3500
Starting List Price

$27.0M

Technical Specification Matrix

Preferred Metric
speed

Performance Metrics

ParameterCitation LongitudeChallenger 3500
Max Range (NBAA IFR)3,500 nmWinner
3,400 nm
Max Cruise SpeedMach 0.84Winner (Speed)
Mach 0.83
Takeoff Distance (SL, ISA, MTOW)4,810 ftShort Field
4,835 ft
Max Operating Altitude45,000 ft45,000 ft
airline_seat_recline_extra

Cabin Environment

Max Certified Seating12 pax10 pax
Cabin Width6.4 ft
7.2 ftWider
Cabin Altitude @ FL4105,950 ft
4,850 ftLower Altitude

Expert Insights

Range & Capability

The Citation Longitude excels in sheer capability with a 3500nm range, making it preferred for extreme ultra-long-haul city pairs, whereas the Challenger 3500 counters with 3400nm.

Cabin Architecture

While the Citation Longitude focuses on its 2-zone configuration (6.4ft wide), the Challenger 3500 provides 7.2ft of width, offering a distinctly different volumetric feel for passengers.

Technological Edge

The Cessna Citation Longitude is a compelling choice in the super mid-size segment because it combin... Both platforms represent the pinnacle of modern fly-by-wire avionics and systems redundancy in the super mid size class.

Operating Economics (Est.)

Variable Costs Per Hour

Citation Longitude$2,284/hr
Challenger 3500$2,142/hr

Economic Note

Estimates based on 450 hours annual utilization. The Challenger 3500 shows higher fuel efficiency resulting in lower direct variable costs per hour, while both airframes require similar fixed overheads for crew and hangarage.